Assure Lifecycle Investment Value from Design to Decommissioning
Challenge:
"We approved a project based on LCC — now it's failing to deliver."
Solution:
We align technical reality with financial promises through value-based contracting.
Case Study: Midstream Infrastructure Owner – Power Expansion Project
Redesigned the procurement strategy to ensure vendor offers were evaluated against true lifecycle cost (LCC), including reliability assumptions, maintenance burden, and operational risk exposure. This protected business value by preventing misalignment between technical specifications and actual performance.
Behind the Scenes: Technical Approach
Method
KVB-C2M® Value-Based Contracting Control Model
Tools
Fidelis RAM modeling, PDEL® for causal integration
Deliverable
Structured evaluation matrix with 96 verification points across technical, financial, and contractual dimensions
Outcome
Protected business value by preventing misalignment between specification and performance
Why This Approach Works
True Lifecycle Cost Accounting
We model not just capital expenditure, but the full operational burden including maintenance intervals, spare parts inventory, crew training requirements, and end-of-life disposal.
Contractual Risk Transfer
Through KVB-C2M®, we structure contracts that align vendor incentives with your operational outcomes — ensuring promises become performance guarantees.
96-Point Verification Framework
Every technical claim, financial assumption, and contractual obligation is verified against formal criteria — eliminating optimistic bias from vendor proposals.